Today, (CNN) Senate holds hearing on Cuba ‘sonic attacks’
Here’s a link to previous articles. Since that time, the FBI has (ABC) come to doubt. But the Russian research involved exposure over weeks, at much lower thresholds than noted by Western sources. Did the F.B.I. consult “Effects of Ultrasonic Noise on the Human Body – A Bibliographic Review”, or set up a similar long term experimental facility?
The NY Post has the most clearly audible sound, as part of a video with spectrum display. Points:
- If development of medical conditions, involving white matter brain damage by U.S. and Canadian diplomats, was contemporaneous with exposure to this noise, the association strongly indicates the operation of a purposeful, specialized device, not the accidental byproduct of some appliance that needs service.
- If the recording device was a cellphone, or anything other than a specialized laboratory microphone-→amplifier-→digitizer, it adds artifacts to the record. Too much may be lost to reconstruct the gadget.
- The audible noise of the recording cannot be the cause of harm. The audible noise is a byproduct, a trace left by ultrasonic noise as a result of nonlinear mixing. This is because high intensity audible noise causes extreme pain, the kind that makes you get up and move away, fast. Ultrasonic noise evades most of it. The lobster boils to death in the pot, but feels nothing.
(IEEE) Was a Sonic Weapon Deployed in Cuba dismisses the feasibility of weaponized ultrasound, citing (pdf) Acoustic Weapons—A Prospective Assessment: Sources, Propagation, and Effects of Strong Sound . But this is contradicted by the Russian references provided in Havana Sonic Attacks — Addendum for techies only.
Still, let’s look at some alternate explanations:
- A “toxin” theory has bee proposed. Quite a number of botanicals consumed by humans contain neurotoxins, such as BMAA.
- Various neurotropic viruses, such as Zika, cause white matter damage.
- They were all sick before they took up residence in Cuba (C’mon!)
But for these to fit, they must also cause auditory parasthesia, changing the sensation of innocuous sound to noxious sound.
A few consumer appliances can make high frequency, or ultrasonic noise, particularly if they are slightly broken:
- An old fashioned television, which can be ruled out immediately.
- A light dimmer.
- A defective compact fluorescent light bulb, a CCFL. But rare, and multiple locations were affected.
- A high frequency inverter, found in backup power systems. But one that makes noise is rare, and multiple locations were affected.
If the quality of the recordings provided to the Office of Naval Research is sufficient, it can be determined if the spectra
- match a consumer appliance.
- match industrial machinery.
- has an intricate, purposeful structure, which strongly implies a weapon.
- is an ambiguous fit for the above.
One of the two spectral displays I’ve seen, not the one in the NY Post video, shows a sharply defined “comb structure”. It has the purposeful signature of a weapon.
The argument for a weapon hinges on Russian research:
35. Il’nitskaia AV, Pal’tsev IuP. [Combined action of ultrasonics and noise of standard parameters]. Gig Sanit. 1973;(5):50–3. In Russian. 36. Roshchin AV, Dobroserdov VK. [Reactions of the human auditory analysor to the effect of high frequency acoustic oscillations]. Gig Tr Prof Zabol. 1971;15(12):3–7.
But how ludicrous to think they could be involved in any way. I’ll lay money Greenland’s independence movement is behind it!